Another thing that we have to accept is politics as conflict and conflict expression of the political animus. And democracy as able to manage conflicts through a permanent renewal. One thing are institutions Basic, suitable to manage the control of stabilization, and other permanent manifestation of ideas that extend the spaces until a transforming freedom. It is clear that the so-called institutions and social intermediaries no longer respond to the demands of the times and, therefore, have to look for new mechanisms. This is the reality of a country a few days of an election that again to be called the last chance, another aberration, because democracy never has one last chance. Simply have walked a bit through historical processes, it is enough not to put all the papers in a drawer, just don't shoot game (used this word with seriousness) of the possibilities beforehand policies, to conclude that broadcast phrases are used in this country, say importunities bulk, is used very bad language. The true revolution is the moral voice. Populism is an assumption in a radical way to achieve uniformity on the imaginary.
The possibility of an all-knowing Government does not fit into the 21st century. The real politician is what makes the world intelligible to the people, that is, which provides the tools to act effectively on already understood. Populism is not fought with populism. Populism should be combated with the planting of understanding led to the degree of a State of alert. The electoral legitimacy and social legitimacy can be contrasted or found.
How to find the second exceeds simply seek the vote in an election campaign full of promises, usually demagogicas. Looking for the second it is often found the first. Intelligible approach that produces previous effects significantly improves the ability of choice. Election campaigns are the culmination of a process in where the individual expresses a preference. Crowded propaganda nothing could modify a prior assumption won in a democracy of proximity generated by the true leaders who seek the will of the majority of the people in the electoral process. Demagoguery with demagoguery cannot be combated. The process of creating clarity and membership is alien to the deceitful and high-sounding words. The process of demagogic repetition by two or more opponents in a contest by a vote leads to rouse a fierce individualism that translates into bet at the biggest deceptive offer. The winner, naturally, will be exercised by the power or, if it has complied with the pedagogical task, which has made a prior work of setting up body on which limited its action to the same election campaign. Electoral majority is not social majority by automatic Act. Forced legitimacy is not confidence. Thus the legitimacy of the power and legitimacy of democratic exercise will be situated on an extremely fragile mud and, as far serious, democracy will collapse by direct effect of all those who wield the power and who seek to replace it, of multiplied demagogues, forcing to power the exercise of force to meet the social demands compulsively. Those who do not understand the existence of invisible institutions and the need to understand the world to the people, let them intelligible, could well close the election, even diminished and extremely dependent gap that still occupies the horizon these days.
The possibility of an all-knowing Government does not fit into the 21st century. The real politician is what makes the world intelligible to the people, that is, which provides the tools to act effectively on already understood. Populism is not fought with populism. Populism should be combated with the planting of understanding led to the degree of a State of alert. The electoral legitimacy and social legitimacy can be contrasted or found.
How to find the second exceeds simply seek the vote in an election campaign full of promises, usually demagogicas. Looking for the second it is often found the first. Intelligible approach that produces previous effects significantly improves the ability of choice. Election campaigns are the culmination of a process in where the individual expresses a preference. Crowded propaganda nothing could modify a prior assumption won in a democracy of proximity generated by the true leaders who seek the will of the majority of the people in the electoral process. Demagoguery with demagoguery cannot be combated. The process of creating clarity and membership is alien to the deceitful and high-sounding words. The process of demagogic repetition by two or more opponents in a contest by a vote leads to rouse a fierce individualism that translates into bet at the biggest deceptive offer. The winner, naturally, will be exercised by the power or, if it has complied with the pedagogical task, which has made a prior work of setting up body on which limited its action to the same election campaign. Electoral majority is not social majority by automatic Act. Forced legitimacy is not confidence. Thus the legitimacy of the power and legitimacy of democratic exercise will be situated on an extremely fragile mud and, as far serious, democracy will collapse by direct effect of all those who wield the power and who seek to replace it, of multiplied demagogues, forcing to power the exercise of force to meet the social demands compulsively. Those who do not understand the existence of invisible institutions and the need to understand the world to the people, let them intelligible, could well close the election, even diminished and extremely dependent gap that still occupies the horizon these days.
Posted by: |